Apollo.io and Instantly.ai are both major player in the cold outreach game.
So obviously choosing between both of them can be a hard task, which is why we’ve compiled a comparison of both tools to help you reach a decision quicker.
Instantly.ai is a sales engagement and automation platform. Essentially it’s an all-in-one platform where you can carry out all of your outreach efforts to gain more clients.
Instantly offers many features that will help you grow your business.
Apollo.io is a go-to-market sales engagement platform, that focuses on lead generation, sales engagement, and CRM. Compared to Instantly, Apollo has a larger suite of features to streamline your sales process, some of them including:
Although Instantly and Apollo have many features, we’re going to analyze the most necessary ones when building your outreach strategy.
In Instantly.ai, you can access the personalization feature “Variables” only after importing your leads.
When you upload the CSV with your leads list, make sure you’ve added your desired variables in columns.
Once you start crafting your email you can include the variable in the copy and the subject line.
Bear in mind that if your variables haven’t been added to the list, you will not be able to include them later on in your email copy.
Some of the variables available in Instantly.ai are:
This is a simple but very effective form of personalization.
Although you can include images in your emails by adding the custom variable {{imageURL}}, these images cannot be personalized.
For Apollo, on the other hand, we can find 3 types of dynamic variables you can include in your manual email copies to add a high-level personalization:
Bear in mind, that if you wish to choose the option “Personalize with AI” you can only choose the manual emails, not automatic emails.
With Apollo’s AI, you can also include icebreakers by adding the variable {{apollo_ai_personalized_opener}}. Apollo will then take information from your leads to create personalized icebreakers in your email copies.
Having a warmup and deliverability feature built into your cold outreach software can really help tip the scales.
At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how good or AI-generated your email copies are if they aren’t landing in your leads’ main inboxes. With a good and automated warm-up feature you can save yourself many headaches!
In this regard, we prefer Instantly as it has a dedicated warm-up feature, whereas Apollo only offers a small email Ramp-up.
Instantly recently added a new pricing category named “Sending & Warm up”, this is dedicated not only to sending your email campaigns, but sending campaigns that work. Instantly offer +550,000 real email accounts for automated email warm-up.
You can connect unlimited accounts and keep warming them, however you wish to do so with customizable options.
With Instantly’s deliverabilty dashboard you’ll be able to track and monitor where your emails are landing.
Credit: Instantly
On the other hand, Apollo currently lacks an actual warm-up feature. Nontheless, you can still prepare your email account for your campaigns with the Ibox Ram-Up, although it may take a bit more work.
Credit: Apollo
The biggest downside of the Ramp-Up is that it can take up to two weeks, and during this time your schedules could be slowed down quite a bit.
However, you can monitor the status of the Ramp-up at any time as well as your mailbox health, a very useful feature to know where you need to make adjustments regarding deliverability.
Reaching your leads when they are ready to buy your product or service is crucial to ensure your success. So having a tool that can provide insights into your leads’ buyer intent can be a real asset.
In this regard, Instantly only offer filters in the database (which we will discuss earlier on), so the start here is Apollo.
Apollo send you alerts via Slack, email, or in Apollo’s control center when buying intent signals are detected. This feature ensures that there are little to no cracks in your campaigns, and allow you to save time with extensive research or emails sent at the wrong time.
A lead database hold contact information of leads such as job title, location, name, contact details, LinkedIn, etc. When picking your cold outreach tool you’ll want to make sure that you can easily find leads within the tool.
Which is why we will be comparing Instantly’s and Apollo’s lead databases.
Instantly has a quite expansive lead database with +160 million verified contacts, although we should mention that it is not an all time high.
The best characteristic we find in Instantly’s lead database are the extensive filters and audience segmentation tools.
Some filters include:
Apollo’s lead database offers +270 million data points, making it a more extensive (and preferable) lead database.
Although Apollo offers less filters, they’re still some very desirable options such as:
With Apollo you also have a feature to enrich your leads.
In this aspect, we consider that Apollo offers a stronger lead database.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to how your outreach software manages your full campaigns. You need strong sending capabilities and campaign optimization.
With Instantly you can set up your CC and BCC on your emails that will allow you to send the same copy to several people, perhaps inside a company so you ensure you don’t miss out on the decision maker.
Instantly also offers features such as A/Z testing to make sure that you’re reaching your campaign’s full potential. This feature makes it standout as a strong choice.
The best part is that Instantly offers Unibox, so you can send your campaigns from different accounts to avoid deliverability issues but not miss out on any messages are they are all centralized in one unique inbox.
The only downside here is that Instantly’s AI generator feature is not avaiable on the Growth plan. Nonetheless you can access the inbuilt templates to create your sequences and simply edit to fit your needs.
Additionally in your sequences, you can set triggers to make sure that they don’t continue to send automatically once your lead has replied.
Apollo offers very strong outreach capabilities with many different options, including multichannel outreach including email, LinkedIn, and cold calling.
Apollo.io allows users to create and manage email sequences, making it easier to automate and personalize outreach campaigns, with an option to A/B test your sequences.
The platform's interface is super intuitive, allowing for easy setup and tracking of email campaigns.
You can link multiple email accounts to Apollo, facilitating diverse outreach strategies.
Although Apollo does offer task management for teams, neither of these options are fully fit for agencies. So if you have an agency, you might be better off with a tool like lemlist!
We will be comparing both pricing models based on monthly billings, although bear in mind that it comes out a bit cheaper when billed annually!
Instantly’s pricing model has become a bit more confusing, as you now have to buy Leads and Campaigns separately.
Instantly has a free trial.
The Growth and Hypergrowth plans have decent pricings ($37 and $97 per month), but it quickly scales X3 if you go for the Light Speed plan at a whopping $358 plan.
On the other hand, Apollo has a more straightforward pricing system, including a free plan and free trials in the Basic and Professional plans.
Apollo’s pricing ranges from $59 to $149, making it a more desirable option than Instantly.
Bear in mind that AI features are not included in the Free or Basic plans!
A quick overview of each tool is clearly not enough, after sifting through Instantly and Apollo’s reviews, here’s what users have to say about them:
→ Instantly ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
G2 4.9/5 (2,764 reviews) | Trust Pilot 4.5/5 (305 reviews)
✅ Pros❌ ConsOverall high deliverability and good warm-up featuresLimited lead management capabilitiesClear insights in the analytics dashboardsHigher plan is too expensiveBuilt-in CRMLacks onboarding
→ Apollo ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
G2 4.8/5 (7,077 reviews) | Capterra 4.6/5 (345 reviews)
✅ Pros❌ ConsIntuitive interfaceSometimes offers outdated lead informationIntegration with other tools enhances workflow efficiencyOnly 2 active sequences in Basic planCall recording featureLacks many leads’ phone numbers
Instantly comes ahead in warm-up and deliverability and the lead database. Even though it has less contacts, the filters are much more detailed and ontact information is said to be more accurate.
Whereas Apollo comes ahead in personalization, buyer intent signal, and overall campaign management.
Nonetheless, the fact that Instantly has it’s own built-in CRM makes it a desirable option.
However, if you’re looking for the best overall option you can’t go wrong with lemlist!
G2 Rating | Price | Best for | Standout feature | Con | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.9 star star star star star | $30/mo $75/mo $2,999/mo | Large, distributed sales teams | AI evaluation precision, gamified KPIs | Lack of tracking system | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Sales operations and finance teams | Powerful configurability | Limited training resources and complex to navigate | |
4.4 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Mid-market and enterprise businesses | Comprehensive incentive management | Potentially high cost and steep learning curve | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | $15/user/mo $40/user/mo Enterprise: custom price | Complex sales structures and businesses of all sizes | Complex sales structures and businesses of all sizes | Steep learning curve | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Collaborative teams | Connected planning | Complexity and steep learning curve | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with complex sales structures | Complex incentive compensation management (ICM) with high efficiency and accuracy | Complexity for smaller teams and potentially high costs | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies who want to automate commission calculations and payouts | Simplicity and ease of use | Lack of features like redirection | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | $30/user/mo $35/user/mo Custom: upon request | Businesses that need a comprehensive and user-friendly sales compensation management software | Ease of use and adoption | Lack of ability to configure the product based on user needs | |
4.8 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with modern sales culture and businesses who want real-time insights | A built-in dispute management and real-time visibility | Users say it works slowly, customer support is slow | |
4.9 star star star star star | $30/user/mo $50/user/mo | Smaller sales teams | Powerful automation | Lesser user base and average user interface | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with scalable needs | Automated Commission Calculations | Lack of filtering by date, no mobile app |
PRM Tool | Rating | Feature | Pro | Con | Mobile App | Integrations | Free Plan | Pricing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.65 star star star star star-half | Org-wide alignment | User-friendly layout and database | Suboptimal as a personal CRM | square-check | Lack of tracking system | square-check | Team: $20/month Business: $45/month | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Social Media Integration | Easy contact data collection | No marketing/sales features | square-check | Lack of tracking system | square-xmark 7-day trial | $12/month | |
4.75 star star star star star-half | Block Functions | High customization capability | Not a dedicated CRM | square-check | Limited | square-check | Plus: €7.50/month Business: €14/month | |
N/A | Open-source | Open-source flexibility | Requires extensive manual input | square-xmark | Limited | square-check Self-hosted | $9/month or $90/year | |
3.1 star star star | Simple iOS app | Ideal for non-tech-savvy users | iPhone only | square-check iOS only | Limited | square-xmark 1-month trial | $1.49/month or $14.99/month | |
3.6 star star star star-half | Smart Contact Management | Feature-rich and flexible | Reported bugs | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 7-day trial | Premium: $13.99/month Teams: $17.99/month | |
4.4 star star star star star-half | Customizable Interface | Customizable for teamwork | Pricey for personal use | square-check | Rich | square-xmark | Standard: $24/member Premium: $39/member | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Integrated Calling | Integrated Calling | Too sales-oriented & pricey | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 14-day trial | Startup: $59/user/month Professional: $329/user/month | |
4.8 star star star star star | Business Card Scanning | Business Card Scanning | Mobile only | square-check | Limited | square-check | $9.99/month | |
4.45 star star star star star-half | 160+ app integrations | Comprehensive integrations | No free app version | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 14-day trial | $29.90/month or $24.90/month (billed annually) |
Capterra Rating | Free Trial | Free Plan | Starting Price (excluding the free plan) | Maximum Price (for the most expensive plan) | Best for | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5 star star star star star-half | square-check 14-day | square-check | €15/month/seat billed annually | €792/month/3 seats billed annually + €45/month for each extra seat | Versatility and free plan | |
4.2 star star star star | square-check 30-day | square-xmark But it offers reduced price to authorised nonprofit organisations | €25/user/month | €500/user/month billed annually (includes Einstein AI) | Best overall operational CRM | |
4.3 star star star star star-half | square-xmark | square-check Limited to 3 users | Comprehensive incentive management | €52/user/month billed annually | Small-medium businesses and automation | |
4.5 star star star star star-half | square-check 14-day | square-xmark | €14/seat/month billed annually | €99/seat/month billed annually | Sales teams and ease of use | |
4.1 star star star star | square-xmark | square-check Limited 10 users | $9.99/user/month billed annually | $64.99/user/month billed annually | Free plan for very small teams up to 10 |
CRM goal | Increase the sales conversion rate for qualified leads from marketing automation campaigns by 10% in the next 6 months. | ||||
SMART Breakdown | 1. Specific: It targets a specific area (conversion rate) for a defined segment (qualified leads from marketing automation). | 2. Measurable: The desired increase (10%) is a clear metric, and the timeframe (6 months) allows for progress tracking. | 3. Achievable: A 10% increase is possible based on historical data and potential improvements. | 4. Relevant: Boosting sales from marketing efforts aligns with overall business objectives. | 5. Time-bound: The 6-month timeframe creates urgency and a clear target date. |
Actions | Step 1: Refine lead qualification criteria to ensure high-quality leads are nurtured through marketing automation. | Step 2: Personalize marketing automation campaigns based on lead demographics, interests, and behavior. | Step 3: Develop targeted landing pages with clear calls to action for qualified leads. | Step 4: Implement lead scoring to prioritize high-potential leads for sales follow-up. | Step 5: Track and analyze campaign performance to identify areas for optimization. |
Outcomes | Increased sales and revenue | Improved marketing automation ROI | Marketing and sales alignment | Data-driven marketing optimization |