It's quite difficult to create the perfect cold email campaign on your first try.
There are no silver bullets, but there's A/B testing.
Cold email A/B testing is the ultimate way to quickly identify what works and what doesn't work in your outreach campaigns.
A/B testing is an experiment where you're split-testing two or more variations randomly, to figure out which variation brings better results.
In the world of cold emails, you can A/B test subject lines, two emails, different personalized images, or the entire sequences if you decide so.
How do you perform an A/B test with cold emails?
There are three important rules to live by:
A/B testing helps you accomplish goals faster in the short-term, as long as you know how to analyze your current cold email performance and identify existing problems.
Let's imagine a situation where you are trying to book meetings using cold emails.
To assess the current state of your outreach campaigns, we need to analyze the following:
To make this even more actionable, let’s analyze some example cold email stats.
What problems do you see?
Two KPIs are standing out here, and not in a good way.
People are not opening these emails. Plus, there are almost no replies.
Considering that the click rate is zero, let's assume there are no links in the cold email, and the sender's sole goal is to get more replies and book meetings.
Goal KPI benchmarks:
In our example, we know where our problems lie.
Assuming that audience targeting is on point, people are not opening our emails and they're definitely not replying.
We need to fix that. Precisely where A/B testing can help.
Before you start playing with open rates, make sure to check your email deliverability status.
When your open rate is lower than 50%, it might mean that people are not seeing your emails to begin with, so A/B testing subject lines would be a waste of time.
So you need to start with:
Once checked, you can move to A/B tests.
That's the first thing people see after receiving your cold email.
In other words, it makes a direct impact on your open rate.
Recommended read:
Top 56 subject lines to test
Just click on the A/B test button.
Add 2 different subject lines that you feel work better and don't change anything else.
lemlist will automatically split your audience into 2 groups and send emails accordingly.
Ideas to test when it comes to subject lines:
For example, after 5 different A/B tests, I found a subject line that gave me an 86% open rate. 😱
I started with a 55% open rate.
Results:
That's the second thing people see before they open a cold email.
It should be catchy, so people will understand "It's not just another spammy email".
In this example, I tested "Hi {firstName}" against "Heyo {firstName}! Just joking Ted".
Here are my results after A/B testing it with usual "Hi {firstName}:
PRO TIP: You shouldn’t only consider the desktop version of your email, as most people receive their emails in their phones or smart watches.
Although it might be tricky to test and sometimes it's a waste of time, there are situations where it's a meaningful factor.
In order to figure out if time is a factor, A/B testing is a great tool to do it.
Try to make 2 different campaigns and send them on different schedules.
Also, consider the country the person you are targeting is in, as timeframes may vary.
There are different cases when you add links to cold emails.
You can send links to articles, use cases, forms, calendar availability, and so on...
Since most people try to generate leads with cold emails, I'll show you examples with links to "book a call" tools, such as lemcal.
People always check the link before they click on it.
If it looks suspicious, they won't click on it in case it’s spam.
So one of the ideas is to A/B test the way your link looks in the cold email. For example:
After 5 tests of different anchors, the results weren't different significantly.
But in all tests, links with anchor won on +3-5% to the click rate.
You really need to A/B test this tactic, it gave me 2x more leads generated from cold emails.
The trick? Dynamic landing pages.
For example, there are 2 ways to send a lemcal link to your leads:
So, my email looked like this:
When people click on the video, they go to a dedicated landing page, where they will see a few more personalized touchpoints, along with the lemcal link to book a demo with me.
And here are the results I got:
The difference was huge! 🔥
Recommended read:
How to land more sales meetings
If you want to try dynamic landing pages, use lemlist for free for 14 days and get unrestricted access to all the cool features. 🔥
The reply rate is the key metric for the majority of people who send cold emails.
The response is the beginning of a conversation that can potentially lead to a win-win situation.
This is a strategy that we talk a lot about in lemlist family, the largest closed community for salespeople.
The Tiramisu strategy consists of writing genuine intro lines and adding custom sentences that change for each prospect.
The results were amazing!
This strategy scored a 92% reply rate.
With lemlist, you can personalize not only the text but also the visual part.
For example, you can add personalized images to your cold emails.
lemlist will automatically change text, logos, website screenshots, and other elements on the image.
Here is an example of a cold email with personalized images:
For instance, you can decide to test a cold email template with text-only content vs. the one with a personalized image.
You can find the most successful cold email templates here.
You can add personalization based on the info you have with liquid syntax.
For example, have "Hi {{fistName}}" if the location is the USA, and "Bonjour
{{firstName}}" if the location is France.
You can also test different call-to-actions based on location.
That's a great thing to A/B test in your cold emails.
You can easily personalize small things based on some general info that you have.
A/B testing is the key to making your cold email perform better.
Don't stop when you find a template that works. Always try to improve and leverage split tests in the process.
Try your 14-day free trial at lemlist now and start A/B testing your campaigns!
G2 Rating | Price | Best for | Standout feature | Con | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.9 star star star star star | $30/mo $75/mo $2,999/mo | Large, distributed sales teams | AI evaluation precision, gamified KPIs | Lack of tracking system | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Sales operations and finance teams | Powerful configurability | Limited training resources and complex to navigate | |
4.4 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Mid-market and enterprise businesses | Comprehensive incentive management | Potentially high cost and steep learning curve | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | $15/user/mo $40/user/mo Enterprise: custom price | Complex sales structures and businesses of all sizes | Complex sales structures and businesses of all sizes | Steep learning curve | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Collaborative teams | Connected planning | Complexity and steep learning curve | |
4.6 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with complex sales structures | Complex incentive compensation management (ICM) with high efficiency and accuracy | Complexity for smaller teams and potentially high costs | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies who want to automate commission calculations and payouts | Simplicity and ease of use | Lack of features like redirection | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | $30/user/mo $35/user/mo Custom: upon request | Businesses that need a comprehensive and user-friendly sales compensation management software | Ease of use and adoption | Lack of ability to configure the product based on user needs | |
4.8 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with modern sales culture and businesses who want real-time insights | A built-in dispute management and real-time visibility | Users say it works slowly, customer support is slow | |
4.9 star star star star star | $30/user/mo $50/user/mo | Smaller sales teams | Powerful automation | Lesser user base and average user interface | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Not publicly available | Companies with scalable needs | Automated Commission Calculations | Lack of filtering by date, no mobile app |
PRM Tool | Rating | Feature | Pro | Con | Mobile App | Integrations | Free Plan | Pricing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.65 star star star star star-half | Org-wide alignment | User-friendly layout and database | Suboptimal as a personal CRM | square-check | Lack of tracking system | square-check | Team: $20/month Business: $45/month | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Social Media Integration | Easy contact data collection | No marketing/sales features | square-check | Lack of tracking system | square-xmark 7-day trial | $12/month | |
4.75 star star star star star-half | Block Functions | High customization capability | Not a dedicated CRM | square-check | Limited | square-check | Plus: €7.50/month Business: €14/month | |
N/A | Open-source | Open-source flexibility | Requires extensive manual input | square-xmark | Limited | square-check Self-hosted | $9/month or $90/year | |
3.1 star star star | Simple iOS app | Ideal for non-tech-savvy users | iPhone only | square-check iOS only | Limited | square-xmark 1-month trial | $1.49/month or $14.99/month | |
3.6 star star star star-half | Smart Contact Management | Feature-rich and flexible | Reported bugs | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 7-day trial | Premium: $13.99/month Teams: $17.99/month | |
4.4 star star star star star-half | Customizable Interface | Customizable for teamwork | Pricey for personal use | square-check | Rich | square-xmark | Standard: $24/member Premium: $39/member | |
4.7 star star star star star-half | Integrated Calling | Integrated Calling | Too sales-oriented & pricey | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 14-day trial | Startup: $59/user/month Professional: $329/user/month | |
4.8 star star star star star | Business Card Scanning | Business Card Scanning | Mobile only | square-check | Limited | square-check | $9.99/month | |
4.45 star star star star star-half | 160+ app integrations | Comprehensive integrations | No free app version | square-check | Rich | square-xmark 14-day trial | $29.90/month or $24.90/month (billed annually) |
Capterra Rating | Free Trial | Free Plan | Starting Price (excluding the free plan) | Maximum Price (for the most expensive plan) | Best for | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5 star star star star star-half | square-check 14-day | square-check | €15/month/seat billed annually | €792/month/3 seats billed annually + €45/month for each extra seat | Versatility and free plan | |
4.2 star star star star | square-check 30-day | square-xmark But it offers reduced price to authorised nonprofit organisations | €25/user/month | €500/user/month billed annually (includes Einstein AI) | Best overall operational CRM | |
4.3 star star star star star-half | square-xmark | square-check Limited to 3 users | Comprehensive incentive management | €52/user/month billed annually | Small-medium businesses and automation | |
4.5 star star star star star-half | square-check 14-day | square-xmark | €14/seat/month billed annually | €99/seat/month billed annually | Sales teams and ease of use | |
4.1 star star star star | square-xmark | square-check Limited 10 users | $9.99/user/month billed annually | $64.99/user/month billed annually | Free plan for very small teams up to 10 |
CRM goal | Increase the sales conversion rate for qualified leads from marketing automation campaigns by 10% in the next 6 months. | ||||
SMART Breakdown | 1. Specific: It targets a specific area (conversion rate) for a defined segment (qualified leads from marketing automation). | 2. Measurable: The desired increase (10%) is a clear metric, and the timeframe (6 months) allows for progress tracking. | 3. Achievable: A 10% increase is possible based on historical data and potential improvements. | 4. Relevant: Boosting sales from marketing efforts aligns with overall business objectives. | 5. Time-bound: The 6-month timeframe creates urgency and a clear target date. |
Actions | Step 1: Refine lead qualification criteria to ensure high-quality leads are nurtured through marketing automation. | Step 2: Personalize marketing automation campaigns based on lead demographics, interests, and behavior. | Step 3: Develop targeted landing pages with clear calls to action for qualified leads. | Step 4: Implement lead scoring to prioritize high-potential leads for sales follow-up. | Step 5: Track and analyze campaign performance to identify areas for optimization. |
Outcomes | Increased sales and revenue | Improved marketing automation ROI | Marketing and sales alignment | Data-driven marketing optimization |